Enrolled Patient Numbers
Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) have constituted the foundation for new drug approvals for over fifty years.
Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) have constituted the foundation for new drug approvals for over fifty years. An Institute of Medicines (IOM) report concluded though in 2008 that RCTs may become unsustainable because of the time and expense involved. In addition, as therapies become more targeted, the financial calculus may make these RCTs even more problematic.
Some industry critics have argued that the increasing number of patients in Phase III clinical trials is actually an industry strategy to improve the statistical strength of clinical trial results and RCTs will actually have to continue to increase in size. As differences between active and non-active arms become more difficult to establish, larger sample sizes are used to improve the chances of reporting statistically significant differences.1 Rather than a response to scientific necessity, the growing number of enrolled patients is a conscious strategy to improve the chances of a favorable regulatory approval decision.
ClinicalTrials.gov reports the actual number of targeted enrolled patients. ClinicalTrials.gov is a federally mandated database with a large, and growing, number of mandatory data fields. One of these mandated fields is number of patients. Another is therapeutic area. These data fields are particularly robust, with missing data under three percent. ClinicalTrials.gov requires that information be reported for any study operating under the auspices of the FDA. This analysis examines Phase III studies conducted by commercial pharmaceutical companies.
The average number of enrolled patients has not changed since 2008 when the enrolled patients variable became mandatory. Only one MedRHA therapeutic area--vascular disorders--shows a statistically significant difference from the overall results for the six years covered by the analysis. However, the number of patients has actually declined over the period in question.
1Adrian G. Sacher, Lisa W. Le, Natasha B. Leighl. Shifting patterns in the interpretation of phase III clinical trial outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the bar is dropping. Journal of Clinical Oncology. March 2014.
Average Patient Enrollment per Phase III Study by Year
Source: Department of Health Policy and Public Policy, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA
Driving Diversity with the Integrated Research Model
October 16th 2024Ashley Moultrie, CCRP, senior director, DEI & community engagement, Javara discusses current trends and challenges with achieving greater diversity in clinical trials, how integrated research organizations are bringing care directly to patients, and more.
AI in Clinical Trials: A Long, But Promising Road Ahead
May 29th 2024Stephen Pyke, chief clinical data and digital officer, Parexel, discusses how AI can be used in clinical trials to streamline operational processes, the importance of collaboration and data sharing in advancing the use of technology, and more.
Zerlasiran Achieves Significant Sustained Reduction in Lipoprotein(a) Levels with Infrequent Dosing
November 20th 2024Zerlasiran, a novel siRNA therapy, demonstrated over 80% sustained reductions in lipoprotein(a) levels with infrequent dosing in the Phase II ALPACAR-360 trial, highlighting its potential as a safe and effective treatment for patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease.
