Were Clinical Trial Practices in East Germany Questionable?
Pharmaceutical companies took advantage of East Germany's financial problems, report found.
Pharmaceutical companies took advantage of East Germany’s financial problems during the second half of the 20th century to carry out clinical trials with ethically uncertain processes, according to new research published today online by the Journal of Medical Ethics.
Trials carried out in the former East Germany – officially known as the German Democratic Republic, GDR - were not always with the full knowledge or understanding of participants with some questionable practices taking place, wrote Dr. Rainer Erices and colleagues from the Institute for the History and Ethics of Medicine in Erlangen, Germany. The country agreed to the trials due to impending bankruptcy there, and Western pharmaceutical companies took advantage of the situation, they noted.
There is still a lack of reliable data about the extent of studies taking place during this period, including the contracts, the amount of money paid, and more moral issues such as patient education and informed consent, but they found documents relating to 220 trials carried out between 1983 and 1990 involving more than 14,000 patients and 68 Western companies. There was, however, no record of patient information forms or systematic documentation regarding the provision of patient consent.
Among the drugs tested were chemotherapeutic agents, insulin, heparin, anti-depressants, anti-allergy and cardiovascular drugs, as well as contrast agents and toothpastes. Between 1983 and 1990, the country’s health system received approximately 16.5 million German Marks for the clinical trials, which were cost effective for the drug firms and which they capitalized on, said the researchers.
Further investigation of any ethical violation during these trials is needed, concluded the authors. “We need reliable results and objective investigation in order to deepen our historical and ethical understanding. Currently, there is very little independent research on the GDR healthcare system of the 1980s. Specific trials now need to be studied separately.”
Read the full release here.
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
