A recent study conducted through pediatric cancer trials found that limited health literacy and use of the Spanish language for medical communication impacted parents’ comprehension of informed consent.1 The authors of the study, published in JAMA Network Open, pointed to past research in this area, which showed that only 32% of parents had an understanding of the purpose behind their clinical trial, with most of the parents being non-Hispanic White individuals.2 This underscores the need to enhance informed consent comprehension across all populations.
The study enrolled 223 parents of children with a new cancer diagnosis at Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego in California, from October 1, 2014, to March 31, 2021.
“Linear mixed effects models were used to assess whether informed consent comprehension overall and by domain (purpose, procedures, and randomization; risks and benefits; alternatives; and voluntariness) were associated with SDOH and sociocontextual factors,” the authors wrote.1
Of the 223 participants, 49.8% were Hispanic and 37.8% of this group used Spanish language for medical communications. “Use of Spanish language for medical communication was associated with lower overall IC comprehension and lower comprehension of the purpose, procedures, and randomization and voluntariness domains, highlighting the importance of language-concordant IC delivery to ensure IC comprehension,” the authors wrote.1
The authors also add that among Hispanic cultural norms, respect may play a role in informed comprehension, as parents who use the Spanish language may be less willing to ask questions compared to those in the study who used the English language, according to the study. Another consideration is the tendency for clinicians to shorten and/or simplify explanations of the study to individuals who do not use the English language. Delving deeper into the study population, the authors found that unmarried marital status and older parental age were also factors that impacted comprehension.1
There are also the unique challenges of obtaining informed consent, which the authors said is particularly difficult in the realm of pediatric cancer.
“With the devastating news of a childhood cancer diagnosis, the shock experienced by parents can affect IC comprehension. Additionally, the time-sensitive nature of starting cancer treatment creates a high-stakes environment that is not conducive to comprehension,” the authors wrote.1
Despite providing valuable insights, the study acknowledged limitations, including a predominantly English- and Spanish-speaking sample and a focus on hematological malignancies. “We did not survey those who declined to participate in the therapeutic clinical trial to determine reasons for declining. Thus, our findings may not represent those who have baseline hesitancy about research participation. Another limitation is that participants with lower health literacy might have had greater difficulty understanding the questionnaires as well as the IC, which might have contributed to the observed differences by health literacy,” the authors explain.1
In conclusion, the authors suggest further research should be done to determine whether all clinical trial participation is voluntary and that all elements of the informed consent are fully comprehended by the decision-maker. “Our findings support the investigation across pediatric disciplines of the potential role of culturally, linguistically, and health literacy–concordant interventions to improve IC comprehension and decision-making and ensure more equitable research participation in racial and ethnic minority populations,” the authors conclude.1
References
- Aristizabal P, Nataraj S, Ma AK, et al. Social Determinants of Health and Informed Consent Comprehension for Pediatric Cancer Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(12):e2346858. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46858
- Cousino MK, Zyzanski SJ, Yamokoski AD, et al. Communicating and understanding the purpose of pediatric phase I cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(35):4367-4372. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.42.3004
Social Determinants of Health Have High Impact on Informed Consent Comprehension, Study Finds
Parents of children with cancer and limited health literacy were associated with lower comprehension of informed consent.
A recent study conducted through pediatric cancer trials found that limited health literacy and use of the Spanish language for medical communication impacted parents’ comprehension of informed consent.1 The authors of the study, published in JAMA Network Open, pointed to past research in this area, which showed that only 32% of parents had an understanding of the purpose behind their clinical trial, with most of the parents being non-Hispanic White individuals.2 This underscores the need to enhance informed consent comprehension across all populations.
The study enrolled 223 parents of children with a new cancer diagnosis at Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego in California, from October 1, 2014, to March 31, 2021.
“Linear mixed effects models were used to assess whether informed consent comprehension overall and by domain (purpose, procedures, and randomization; risks and benefits; alternatives; and voluntariness) were associated with SDOH and sociocontextual factors,” the authors wrote.1
Of the 223 participants, 49.8% were Hispanic and 37.8% of this group used Spanish language for medical communications. “Use of Spanish language for medical communication was associated with lower overall IC comprehension and lower comprehension of the purpose, procedures, and randomization and voluntariness domains, highlighting the importance of language-concordant IC delivery to ensure IC comprehension,” the authors wrote.1
The authors also add that among Hispanic cultural norms, respect may play a role in informed comprehension, as parents who use the Spanish language may be less willing to ask questions compared to those in the study who used the English language, according to the study. Another consideration is the tendency for clinicians to shorten and/or simplify explanations of the study to individuals who do not use the English language. Delving deeper into the study population, the authors found that unmarried marital status and older parental age were also factors that impacted comprehension.1
There are also the unique challenges of obtaining informed consent, which the authors said is particularly difficult in the realm of pediatric cancer.
“With the devastating news of a childhood cancer diagnosis, the shock experienced by parents can affect IC comprehension. Additionally, the time-sensitive nature of starting cancer treatment creates a high-stakes environment that is not conducive to comprehension,” the authors wrote.1
Despite providing valuable insights, the study acknowledged limitations, including a predominantly English- and Spanish-speaking sample and a focus on hematological malignancies. “We did not survey those who declined to participate in the therapeutic clinical trial to determine reasons for declining. Thus, our findings may not represent those who have baseline hesitancy about research participation. Another limitation is that participants with lower health literacy might have had greater difficulty understanding the questionnaires as well as the IC, which might have contributed to the observed differences by health literacy,” the authors explain.1
In conclusion, the authors suggest further research should be done to determine whether all clinical trial participation is voluntary and that all elements of the informed consent are fully comprehended by the decision-maker. “Our findings support the investigation across pediatric disciplines of the potential role of culturally, linguistically, and health literacy–concordant interventions to improve IC comprehension and decision-making and ensure more equitable research participation in racial and ethnic minority populations,” the authors conclude.1
References
Imlunestrant Both as Monotherapy and in Combination Shows Promising Survival Benefits for ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer
Results from the EMBER-3 trial show imlunestrant, both as monotherapy and in combination with Verzenio (abemaciclib), significantly improved progression-free survival in ESR1-mutated ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
Long-Term Data Show Lynparza Significantly Improves Survival in Germline BRCA Mutated, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Data from the OlympiA Phase III trial show Lynparza (olaparib) significantly improved the risk of death, invasive disease-free survival, and distant disease-free survival over six years in patients with germline BRCA-mutated HER2-negative high-risk early breast cancer.
DREAMM-7 Trial Shows Blenrep's Potential to Transform Multiple Myeloma Treatment with Superior Survival
Results from the DREAMM-7 Phase III trial demonstrated that Blenrep (belantamab mafodotin) combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment response in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma compared to a daratumumab-based regimen.
Carvykti Significantly Boosts Survival, MRD Negativity in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
Phase III CARTITUDE-4 trial shows Carvykti significantly improves minimal residual disease negativity rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared to standard therapies for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, especially when used earlier in treatment.
Landmark Phase III Trial Results Show Blincyto Plus Chemotherapy Boosts Three-Year Survival in Pediatric Standard-Risk B-Cell ALL
The Phase III AALL1731 trial demonstrated that adding Blincyto (blinatumomab) to chemotherapy significantly improved three-year disease-free survival in pediatric patients with standard-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Review Highlights Gaps in Publicly Funded Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials, Call for Better Design and Reporting Practices
Publicly funded non-inferiority trials have grown in popularity with high levels of non-inferiority margin reporting; however, a recent analysis notes a need for improved design and reporting practices to ensure clinical relevance and reliability.
Imlunestrant Both as Monotherapy and in Combination Shows Promising Survival Benefits for ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer
Results from the EMBER-3 trial show imlunestrant, both as monotherapy and in combination with Verzenio (abemaciclib), significantly improved progression-free survival in ESR1-mutated ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
Long-Term Data Show Lynparza Significantly Improves Survival in Germline BRCA Mutated, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Data from the OlympiA Phase III trial show Lynparza (olaparib) significantly improved the risk of death, invasive disease-free survival, and distant disease-free survival over six years in patients with germline BRCA-mutated HER2-negative high-risk early breast cancer.
DREAMM-7 Trial Shows Blenrep's Potential to Transform Multiple Myeloma Treatment with Superior Survival
Results from the DREAMM-7 Phase III trial demonstrated that Blenrep (belantamab mafodotin) combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment response in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma compared to a daratumumab-based regimen.
Carvykti Significantly Boosts Survival, MRD Negativity in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
Phase III CARTITUDE-4 trial shows Carvykti significantly improves minimal residual disease negativity rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared to standard therapies for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, especially when used earlier in treatment.
Landmark Phase III Trial Results Show Blincyto Plus Chemotherapy Boosts Three-Year Survival in Pediatric Standard-Risk B-Cell ALL
The Phase III AALL1731 trial demonstrated that adding Blincyto (blinatumomab) to chemotherapy significantly improved three-year disease-free survival in pediatric patients with standard-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Review Highlights Gaps in Publicly Funded Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials, Call for Better Design and Reporting Practices
Publicly funded non-inferiority trials have grown in popularity with high levels of non-inferiority margin reporting; however, a recent analysis notes a need for improved design and reporting practices to ensure clinical relevance and reliability.