Site-Cost Line Item Charges on the Rise
Applied Clinical Trials
Tufts CSDD
Clinical grants are growing increasingly sophisticated. Consquently, investigator site startup costs have become increasingly complex as well. Clinical sites are charging for a greater amount of site-cost line items. In addition, sites are charging more for those line items.
TTC's GrantPlan database contains grants from 76% of global clinical trials. GrantPlan tracks all the site-cost line items from clinical grants. The most common site costs are general site startup administrative fees, advertising, IRB fees, and pharmacy fees.
In 2010 the average number of line items included in global clinical grant site costs was 2.9 line items. That number increased to 3.0 in 2011, and is currently approaching 3.1 line items in 2012. Advertising fees are most responsible for the additional line items.
Additionally, sites are charging more for individual line items. The single most common site cost is the general administrative site startup fee. Between 2010 and 2011 the average site startup administrative fee increased 8%. Halfway through 2012, the average startup administrative fee has increased 3%.
—TTC (for more information, please contact help@ttc-llc.com)
Driving Diversity with the Integrated Research Model
October 16th 2024Ashley Moultrie, CCRP, senior director, DEI & community engagement, Javara discusses current trends and challenges with achieving greater diversity in clinical trials, how integrated research organizations are bringing care directly to patients, and more.
AI in Clinical Trials: A Long, But Promising Road Ahead
May 29th 2024Stephen Pyke, chief clinical data and digital officer, Parexel, discusses how AI can be used in clinical trials to streamline operational processes, the importance of collaboration and data sharing in advancing the use of technology, and more.
Zerlasiran Achieves Significant Sustained Reduction in Lipoprotein(a) Levels with Infrequent Dosing
November 20th 2024Zerlasiran, a novel siRNA therapy, demonstrated over 80% sustained reductions in lipoprotein(a) levels with infrequent dosing in the Phase II ALPACAR-360 trial, highlighting its potential as a safe and effective treatment for patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease.
