Phase II Piranga trial found that the combination of xalnesiran and an immunomodulator effectively reduced hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels, but highlighted challenges in response durability and efficacy in patients with high HBsAg levels.
Credit: bluebay2014 | stock.adobe.com
The Phase II Piranga trial (NCT04225715) found that the combination of the novel hepatitis B drug xalnesiran plus an immunomodulator produced significant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss rates; however, the durability of response and efficacy in patients with high HBsAg-levels remain a challenge, according to the authors of the study, published by The New England Journal of Medicine.1,2 They added that these findings highlight the need for tailored approaches that target adaptive hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunity.
“Xalnesiran with or without an immunomodulator resulted in substantial reduction in the HBsAg level during treatment, with up to 60% of the participants having an HBsAg level maintained below 100 IU per milliliter at 48 weeks after the end of treatment,” the study authors wrote. “This finding is consistent with results of a previous study and with the long half-life of N-acetyl-d-galactosamine–conjugated small interfering RNA molecules in the liver. However, the addition of an immunomodulator was essential for HBsAg loss.”1
HBV is classified as a hepaDNA virus, comprised of four distinct genomic regions with a complex mode of replication susceptible to the development of mutant forms of the virus. HBV is typically diagnosed by a HBsAg test to detect active infection.3
Management of HBV typically involves preventive measures that seek to minimize active infection rates. Beyond preventative actions, maintaining antibody levels is also of significant importance. Among patients with active HBV infection, interferon alfa is typically used to directly inactivate viral DNA by inhibiting protein synthesis.
“Standard care, which includes pegylated interferon therapy of finite duration (48 weeks) and lifelong nucleoside or nucleotide analogue (NA) therapy, rarely leads to functional cure, which occurs in only up to 7% of patients after 12 months of treatment,” the study authors wrote. “To improve functional cure rates, an emerging strategy involves combining new antiviral agents to reduce the antigenic load with immunomodulators to restore the dysregulated immune response.”1
Xalnesiran, a novel N-acetyl-d-galactosamine–conjugated synthetic double-stranded small interfering RNA molecule, targets the S conserved region of the HBV genome, which the study authors said allows it to silence multiple transcripts. A prior Phase I trial found that the drug achieved substantial and durable decreases in HBsAg levels, indicating it could become the “backbone of finite-duration treatment regimens.”1
Piranga was a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, controlled, adaptive, open-label platform trial. A total of 159 patients were randomly assigned to one of five groups in a 1:1 ratio, which analyzed 48 weeks of treatment with xalnesiran at a dose of 100 mg in group 1 (n = 30), xalnesiran at a dose of 200 mg in group 2 (n = 30), xalnesiran at a dose of 200 mg plus 150 mg of ruzotolimod in group 3 (n = 34), xalnesiran at a dose of 200 mg plus 180 μg of pegylated interferon alfa-2a in group 4 (n = 30), and monotherapy with a nucleoside or nucleotide analogue (NA) in group 5 ( n = 35) among participants with chronic HBV infection who achieved virologic suppression with NA therapy. The trial’s primary efficacy endpoint was HBsAg loss (HBsAg level, <0.05 IU per milliliter) at 24 weeks following the end of treatment, as well as safety.
Among the five cohorts, the primary endpoint event was observed in 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1 to 22) of patients in group 1, 3% (95% CI, 0 to 17) in group 2, 12% (95% CI, 3 to 28) in group 3, 23% (95% CI, 10 to 42) in group 4, and zero (95% CI, 0 to 10) in group 5. HBsAg seroconversion occurred in 3% in group 1, zero in group 2, 3% in group 3, 20% in group 4, and zero in group 5 at 24 weeks after the end of treatment. HBsAg loss with or without seroconversion was only observed in patients with a screening HBsAg level below 1000 IU per milliliter.
In terms of safety, grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were reported by 17% of patients in group 1, 10% in group 2, 18% in group 3, 50% in group 4, and 6% in group 5. The most commonly reported AE was elevated alanine aminotransferase level.
“This phase 2 trial showed that treatment with xalnesiran plus an immunomodulator led to substantial percentages of participants with HBsAg loss, while identifying challenges in durability of HBsAg loss and efficacy in participants with high HBsAg levels,” the study authors concluded. “To address these challenges, a potential approach could be to specifically target adaptive immunity and restore HBV-specific exhausted T cells. Combination regimens containing checkpoint inhibitors are being explored in chronic hepatitis B, including a liver-targeted locked nucleic acid that degrades programmed death ligand 1 expressionand is being evaluated in combination with xalnesiran in other groups of the Piranga platform trial.”1
References
1. Hou J., et al. Xalnesiran with or without an Immunomodulator in Chronic Hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2024;391:2098-2109. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2405485. Vol. 391 No. 22.
2. A Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Multiple Combination Therapies In Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B (Piranga). ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated August 20, 2024. Accessed December 5, 2024. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04225715
3. Gregorio, Germana V, et al. Viral Hepatitis. National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1995, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/. Accessed December 5, 2024.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
POETYK PsA-2 Trial Shows Efficacy of Sotyktu as an Oral Therapy for Psoriatic Arthritis
March 11th 2025Sotyktu (deucravacitinib) demonstrated significant efficacy in improving psoriatic arthritis symptoms compared to placebo in the Phase III POETYK PsA-2 trial, with a well-tolerated safety profile.
Reaching Diverse Patient Populations With Personalized Treatment Methods
January 20th 2025Daejin Abidoye, head of solid tumors, oncology development, AbbVie, discusses a number of topics around diversity in clinical research including industry’s greatest challenges in reaching diverse patient populations, personalized treatment methods, recruitment strategies, and more.
Integrated Multi-Omic Data: Powering Precision Medicine
March 10th 2025Genomics has long been a primary focus in precision medicine, but other areas of research are increasingly being used to help attain a more complete picture of how an individual’s complex biology impacts their health profile.