Following steady growth through the 1990s, the number of principal investigators conducting industry-sponsored clinical studies in the United States has declined 11% since 2001, according to a study recently completed by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.
BOSTON - May 3, 2005 - Following steady growth through the 1990s, the number of principal investigators conducting industry-sponsored clinical studies in the United States has declined 11% since 2001, according to a study recently completed by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.
The drop in principal investigators has been spurred by a similar decline in the number of active clinical trials, the study found.
According to Tufts CSDD, a 10.6% decline in clinical trials has led to an 11.4% drop in total principal investigators in the U.S. between 2001 and 2003.
The study, the first of its kind to assess the principal investigator landscape, also found that turnover rates among principal investigators in the U.S. have nearly doubled since 2001, while regional and gender disparities among principal investigators have grown.
Tufts CSDD conducted extensive analyses of a database of more than 100,000 principal investigators who registered with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to conduct clinical trials of investigational drugs between 1977 and 2004.
"The decline in the number of principal investigators and the high turnover rate pose several threats to research sponsors," noted Ken Getz, research fellow at Tufts CSDD and author of the study.
"The capacity of the market to conduct clinical trials for industry sponsors is eroding and efforts to establish a well trained, experienced pool of clinical investigators may become more difficult."
In addition, he said, growing gender and regional disparities among principal investigators will limit professional opportunities and potentially diminish scientific and economic benefits to declining regions. "This, in turn, could make it more difficult to recruit representative patient populations," said Getz.
Commenting on the significance of the study's findings, Tufts CSDD Director Kenneth I Kaitin said, "As the time, cost, and risk of new product development increases, pharmaceutical and biotech companies are looking to identify bottlenecks and improve efficiency of every facet of drug development. We believe this study will help them assess and improve their management of investigative sites."
The Tufts Center's analysis, summarized in the just-published May/June Tufts CSDD Impact Report, also found that:
About the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development
The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development () at Tufts University provides strategic information to help drug developers, regulators, and policy makers improve the quality and efficiency of pharmaceutical development, review, and utilization. The Tufts Center, based in Boston, conducts a wide range of in-depth analyses on pharmaceutical issues and hosts symposia, workshops, and public forums on related topics, and publishes the Tufts CSDD Impact Report, a bi-monthly newsletter providing analysis and insight into critical drug development issues.
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
FDA-Approved Gene Therapy Beqvez Shows Sustained Efficacy, Safety in Long-Term Hemophilia B Trial
April 17th 2025Beqvez (fidanacogene elaparvovec), an FDA-approved one-time gene therapy for hemophilia B, demonstrated sustained factor IX expression, low bleeding rates, and a favorable safety profile over long-term follow-up.