The current regulatory system for medicines in Europe could be used in a more efficient and effective manner, according to a report from Escher.
The current regulatory system for medicines in Europe could be used in a more efficient and effective manner, according to a report from Escher, a Dutch-based company.
“Overall, the EU regulatory system operates well, however important recent changes have not yet been evaluated,” said André Broekmans, chairman of Escher. “One of our conclusions is that pathways that were intended to bring important new medicines faster to the market are not used in the right way. We are therefore missing opportunities to make medicines available to patients earlier.”
Escher collaborated with researchers from Utrecht University, the Netherlands, to look into areas that might be improved: pharmacovigilance, conditional approval, pediatric investigation plans, and decentralized authorization procedures.
The team’s research shows that some regulations are not achieving their goals. For example, the conditional marketing authorization pathway was intended to bring much-needed products, e.g., for cancer treatment, to the market faster. In practice, the researchers found that it has often been used as a back-up for the ‘normal’ approval pathway, because requesting conditional approval had some perceived drawbacks (e.g. potential reimbursement issues and the level of post-marketing obligations).
They also identified opportunities for making the regulatory system more efficient, without compromising public health, for example by adjusting the timing of the submission and the level of detail of plans for the investigation of medicines in children. Broekmans thinks such discrepancies between the initial objectives of legislation and the effects of regulatory instruments in practice should be better monitored.
Accord to Richard Bergström, director general of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), “Our latest learning from genomics and our improved understanding of human biology have resulted in a record number of promising break-through medicines in development. Entering a new era of personalized medicine, the current model for medicines development and approval may not be appropriate. Against this background EFPIA decided to provide an unrestricted research grant to the Escher platform to explore if the model is fit for purpose."
Read the full release here.
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.