The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) partners funded £393m worth of research into cancer in 2006, an increase of £135m compared to 2002.
NCRI SEES RECORD INVESTMENT IN CANCER RESEARCH
The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) partners funded £393m worth of research into cancer in 2006, an increase of £135m compared to 2002. But it will warn of slower progress in spend for some cancers, it is announced at the NCRI Cancer Conference in Birmingham today (Sunday).
An analysis of cancer research spend by the NCRI – a collaboration of government and charity partners-reveals that between 2002 and 2006, its 20 member organisations spent a total of £1.6 billion on cancer research in the UK.
During this period, the NCRI witnessed an increase in spend from its members on most types of cancer, and a doubling of investment in cancer prevention work. But its analysis also revealed that some cancers faired better than others. Of particular concern were lung, pancreatic and oesophageal cancers, which remain difficult to treat and research. This is largely due to the fact that symptoms often present late – resulting in the cancer being at a more advanced stage at diagnosis and the difficulties associated with where the tumour is located in the body.
Dr. Jane Cope, director of NCRI explains: “These figures show the extent to which investment in research is mirrored by increasing survival rates-which is great news. But it’s of concern that we’re not seeing the same improvements for some of the harder to treat cancers.
“There is a ‘snowball effect’ at work here-the more a cancer is researched, the more avenues are opened for further work. Well understood cancers like breast and leukaemia have a “critical mass” of research behind them that has been built over many years and which leads to more research and promising findings.
“The NCRI is committed to developing ways to drive forward research activity in the more challenging areas and has already found some solutions but clearly there is still more to do.”
Although nearly four per cent of research funding targeted to a specific tumour site was directed towards lung cancer in 2006, the disease accountfor 22 percent of cancer deaths. NCRI established a group to examine the reasons why lung has received less attention than other cancers, relative to incidence and mortality. A number of priority areas for action were identified and are being pursued, including £2.25m allocated to supportive and palliative care research in lung cancer.
Since its inception in 2002, the NCRI has collected information on all the cancer research funded by its member organisations. This enables them toanalyse and understand the overall investment in cancer research at a national level, with the aim of reducing gaps in the portfolio and responding to opportunities.
One of the biggest increases in investment has been in prevention research, which leapt from £6m to £14m in the five years since the NCRI’s inception. Prevention research now makes up almost four per cent of the NCRI’s total funding portfolio-up from two per cent in 2002. This investment has in part been administered through the National Prevention Research Initiative (NPRI), established in 2004 by the NCRI in to drive forward work in this area. In 2008, an additional £12m was awarded for a third call for proposals to advance research in this field and this will ensure that the increased trend in investment will continue.
Professor Sir Ken Calman, chair of the NCRI, said: “This important analysis allows us to see where we’ve done well and address those areas where investment is still lacking. The increase in overall spend is encouraging but we must not be complacent – the variations in relative spend on the different disease sites are clearly concerning and we will work towards ensuring that all cancers receive the focus and attention that they deserve, so that more people can survive the disease.”
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
FDA-Approved Gene Therapy Beqvez Shows Sustained Efficacy, Safety in Long-Term Hemophilia B Trial
April 17th 2025Beqvez (fidanacogene elaparvovec), an FDA-approved one-time gene therapy for hemophilia B, demonstrated sustained factor IX expression, low bleeding rates, and a favorable safety profile over long-term follow-up.