Moving Toward Personalized Healthcare
PCORI underscored existing trends toward increasingly individualized and personalized medical care...
Editor’s Note: This article is part of a series examining popular peer-reviewed articles from years past called “Peer-Reviews Revisited: Why You Should Read Today.” You can read the other articles in this series here.
The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act authorized the creation of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. PCORI underscored existing trends toward increasingly individualized and personalized medical care, and required research protocols to include various subpopulations such as racial and ethnic minorities, women, age, and comorbidities, genetic and molecular subtypes, and quality of life preferences.
“This requirement presents the potential to discover and disseminate crucial comparative effectiveness research findings that individual patients and their clinicians need for making informed health-care decisions,” said Kathleen Wyrwich, PhD, Senior Research Leader at Evidera Outcomes Research Group, Bethesda, MD. Dr. Wyrwich is also lead author of an examination of “Personalized Healthcare” that appeared in Applied Clinical Trials based on a panel discussion at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research annual meeting in 2011.
“Healthcare providers and systems know race, ethnicity, sex, age, comorbidity status, and other relevant information for patients,” she added. “A more holistic definition of precision or personalized healthcare can now be considered, the promise of knowing which interventions are most effective for which patients and under what circumstances. [It] also incorporates the personal needs, preferences, healthcare access, and adherence attributes that each person brings to the healthcare encounter in addition to genomic information.”
Discussants offered key perspectives on the need for and development of personalized medicine.
- Subgroup effectiveness is already part of routine oncology care. Information derived from subgroup analysis is affecting patient care by changing therapeutic choices.
- About two-thirds of all drugs currently in the development pipeline have an associated biomarker. Personalization and more precise delivery of care is already built into these product development programs.
Generics have become the standard of care for many diseases. Trial sponsors must identify and target subpopulations that are less than optimally responsive to existing agents or may be at increased risk due to specific genetic, molecular, or other individual factors.
Study Finds Many Randomized Clinical Trials Have Poorly Justified Exclusion Criteria
January 21st 2025Investigators find that most exclusion criteria in critical care randomized clinical trials are justifiable, but 60% include at least one poorly justified exclusion, most commonly affecting pregnant or lactating individuals.
STEP UP Trial Shows Semaglutide 7.2 mg Achieves Superior Weight Loss vs. 2.4 mg, Placebo
January 17th 2025Semaglutide 7.2 mg significantly outperformed semaglutide 2.4 mg and placebo with a 20.7% average reduction in weight and a comparable safety and tolerability profile, further establishing its efficacy in obesity treatment.
Empowering Sites and Patients: The Impact of Personalized Support in Clinical Trials
November 26th 2024To meet the growing demands of clinical research, sponsors must prioritize comprehensive support models, such as clinical site ambassadors and patient journey coordinators, who can address operational challenges and improve site relationships, patient satisfaction, and overall trial efficiency.
FDA Finalizes Decentralized Clinical Trial Guidance
November 25th 2024The FDA's guidance is part of a broader effort to modernize clinical trials, improve efficiency, reduce participant burden, and expand access, particularly for underrepresented populations and those in geographically or economically constrained areas.
