Racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to develop cancer and die from it than the general US population. However, as the next generation of cancer medicines are being evaluated, only 17 percent of clinical trial participants are, in fact, minorities.1
Today, Eli Lilly and Company announced findings from a prospectively designed observational study that resulted in new ways to increase minority participation in clinical trials. The study, released at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) annual "Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved" meeting in Washington, DC, assessed the impact of ethnicity on the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
As part of Lilly's goal to improve health outcomes for all patients, the company is working to increase enrollment of diverse populations in clinical trials, and making trials more accessible in minority communities.
"Our mission is to develop tailored therapies for some of the most difficult-to-treat tumors, in the populations that need them most," said Coleman Obasaju, MD, PhD, Senior Medical Director at Lilly Oncology. "Since lung cancer outcomes differ for different racial groups, it is imperative that these populations are represented in clinical trials."
When the study began, it had 19 percent minority representation, including 28 African Americans, 7 Asian Americans and 10 Hispanic Americans. Historically, there are a variety of reasons that minorities don't participate in clinical research, including: lack of awareness of clinical trial research; economic factors; language and cultural barriers; and participant mistrust.
Lilly then took steps to increase the number of underserved minority participants, including: the selection of new trial sites likely to include more than 50 percent minority patient populations; providing patients with information regarding patient assistance programs that help them secure treatment; and on-site visits to trial sites to identify and address existing barriers. In addition, all patient materials were translated into Spanish. Following the trial, Lilly began creating culturally competent patient tools, such as a Latino Toolkit that provided trial sites with information that supported efforts in recruiting and supporting Hispanic American patients on future trials, which were developed in partnership with the Education Network to Advance Clinical Trials.
Lilly also sponsored multiple advisory boards and conducted a survey of 241 clinical trial investigators and coordinators to assess the impact of protocol design on minority participation. The results showed that certain improvements, such as the use of patient navigators who help guide a patient through the treatment process, and taking into account language and ethnic considerations of potential participants when designing trial protocols, were called for. With these enhancements in place, minority participation increased, with 43 percent of the remaining enrollees representing multicultural populations (37 African Americans, 30 Asian Americans and 18 Hispanic Americans), with the trial ultimately not reaching critical mass on the Asian American and Hispanic American arms.
"While the study fell short of its planned patient accrual, with only 434 of 1,000 patients enrolled, it proved that minority participation in clinical trials can increase dramatically with targeted interventions," said Dr. Obasaju. "We will apply these learnings to future trials right from the start," he added.
Lilly's clinical trial strategy includes efforts to educate and encourage physicians and patients to understand the importance of diversity in clinical trials, as well as partnerships with other organizations committed to the same goal.
1. American Cancer Society. "Cancer Facts & Figures 2011." http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-figures-2011
FDA Finalizes Decentralized Clinical Trial Guidance
November 25th 2024The FDA's guidance is part of a broader effort to modernize clinical trials, improve efficiency, reduce participant burden, and expand access, particularly for underrepresented populations and those in geographically or economically constrained areas.
Driving Diversity with the Integrated Research Model
October 16th 2024Ashley Moultrie, CCRP, senior director, DEI & community engagement, Javara discusses current trends and challenges with achieving greater diversity in clinical trials, how integrated research organizations are bringing care directly to patients, and more.
AI in Clinical Trials: A Long, But Promising Road Ahead
May 29th 2024Stephen Pyke, chief clinical data and digital officer, Parexel, discusses how AI can be used in clinical trials to streamline operational processes, the importance of collaboration and data sharing in advancing the use of technology, and more.
Patient Engagement Platform Checklist
November 22nd 2024Modern clinical trials are more complex than ever, and one significant reason is the increased focus on patient engagement. Incorporating a patient engagement platform into your clinical trial enhances the patient experience and can lead to more successful trials with stronger, more reliable outcomes. We put together this helpful checklist of key features to look out for when choosing a platform for your study.
The Rise of Predictive Engagement Tools in Clinical Trials
November 22nd 2024Patient attrition can be a significant barrier to the success of a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Today, with the help of AI-powered predictive engagement tools, clinical study managers are finding ways to proactively reduce attrition rates in RCTs, and increase the effectiveness of their trial. In this guide, we look at the role AI-powered patient engagement tools play in clinical research, from the problems they’re being used to solve to the areas and indications in which they’re being deployed.