Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
|Articles|September 22, 2011

Lilly Steps Up Efforts to Improve Diversity in Clinical Trials

Racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to develop cancer and die from it than the general US population. However, as the next generation of cancer medicines are being evaluated, only 17 percent of clinical trial participants are, in fact, minorities.1

Today, Eli Lilly and Company announced findings from a prospectively designed observational study that resulted in new ways to increase minority participation in clinical trials. The study, released at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) annual "Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved" meeting in Washington, DC, assessed the impact of ethnicity on the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

As part of Lilly's goal to improve health outcomes for all patients, the company is working to increase enrollment of diverse populations in clinical trials, and making trials more accessible in minority communities.

"Our mission is to develop tailored therapies for some of the most difficult-to-treat tumors, in the populations that need them most," said Coleman Obasaju, MD, PhD, Senior Medical Director at Lilly Oncology. "Since lung cancer outcomes differ for different racial groups, it is imperative that these populations are represented in clinical trials."

When the study began, it had 19 percent minority representation, including 28 African Americans, 7 Asian Americans and 10 Hispanic Americans. Historically, there are a variety of reasons that minorities don't participate in clinical research, including: lack of awareness of clinical trial research; economic factors; language and cultural barriers; and participant mistrust.

Lilly then took steps to increase the number of underserved minority participants, including: the selection of new trial sites likely to include more than 50 percent minority patient populations; providing patients with information regarding patient assistance programs that help them secure treatment; and on-site visits to trial sites to identify and address existing barriers. In addition, all patient materials were translated into Spanish. Following the trial, Lilly began creating culturally competent patient tools, such as a Latino Toolkit that provided trial sites with information that supported efforts in recruiting and supporting Hispanic American patients on future trials, which were developed in partnership with the Education Network to Advance Clinical Trials.

Lilly also sponsored multiple advisory boards and conducted a survey of 241 clinical trial investigators and coordinators to assess the impact of protocol design on minority participation. The results showed that certain improvements, such as the use of patient navigators who help guide a patient through the treatment process, and taking into account language and ethnic considerations of potential participants when designing trial protocols, were called for. With these enhancements in place, minority participation increased, with 43 percent of the remaining enrollees representing multicultural populations (37 African Americans, 30 Asian Americans and 18 Hispanic Americans), with the trial ultimately not reaching critical mass on the Asian American and Hispanic American arms.

"While the study fell short of its planned patient accrual, with only 434 of 1,000 patients enrolled, it proved that minority participation in clinical trials can increase dramatically with targeted interventions," said Dr. Obasaju. "We will apply these learnings to future trials right from the start," he added.

Lilly's clinical trial strategy includes efforts to educate and encourage physicians and patients to understand the importance of diversity in clinical trials, as well as partnerships with other organizations committed to the same goal.

1. American Cancer Society. "Cancer Facts & Figures 2011." http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-figures-2011


Related to this article

Closing the Community Access Gap: Q&A with Kent Thoelke, Paradigm Health
In this Q&A, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, discusses why participation gaps in community and rural settings come down to both patient cost barriers and site infrastructure, how legacy workflows weigh on community clinics, and what policy and technology changes it would take to make clinical research a real care option for more patients.
© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.