Commentary|Videos|December 11, 2024

Industry Perceptions of Decentralized Clinical Trials

In this video interview, Jane Myles, program director, Decentralized Trials & Research Alliance (DTRA), discusses how some stakeholders view DCTs only as fully remote trials.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Jane Myles, program director, Decentralized Trials & Research Alliance (DTRA), discussed trends and challenges in decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) including misconceptions and the rapid adoption of DCT elements. Myles also highlighted DTRA's initiatives on site adoption, operational planning, and the integration of digital health technologies.

ACT: What are some trends and challenges you’re currently seeing with decentralized clinical trials (DCTs)?

Myles: I would say that maybe people are a little bit allergic to the term DCT, which doesn't mean they're not using DCT elements. What I mean by that is there are a lot of people who hear DCT and react just to the acronym, and many of them are potentially thinking DCT means fully remote, which, as we know, it doesn't. When they hear DCT, it conjures up these concepts of site-less trials and fully virtual and nobody ever sees a doctor, and we know now that is not the case for the vast majority of trials where DCT elements are used. It's even reflective of how the FDA guidance on DCTs changed from draft to final form. The terminology DCT is an allergen, but the adoption is actually going pretty quickly. I would say, realistically, there's still challenges implementing DCT elements across different regions of the world, just because they need to look like the actual processes are a little bit different in different places, but I wouldn't say that it's because there's a technology gap, or even a will to use gap in any one region.


Related to this article

Why Seizure Counts Alone Can't Define Success in Epilepsy Trials
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why the full burden of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies extends far beyond clinical symptoms—and why endpoints must reflect what families are actually hoping for.
What It Actually Means to Embed the Patient Voice in Trial Design
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why genuine patient partnership begins before the protocol is written—and what it looks like when patients and caregivers tell you a trial was designed with them in mind.
Introducing The Human Side of Clinical Trials
This pilot episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials introduces a framework from Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., exploring why operational failures in clinical trials often trace back to gaps in human readiness rather than process design alone.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: How Measuring Readiness at Training Predicts Trial Risk Before It Shows Up in the Data
This episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, hosted by Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., and Kelly Ritch, chief operating officer of ArcheMedX, Inc., explores why training completion metrics like attendance and quiz scores fail to capture true study readiness, and how measuring both competence and confidence can reveal trial risks before enrollment even begins.
What the Epilepsy Community Has Taught Us About Trial Feasibility
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, shares what she has learned firsthand from families living with Dravet syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder about what makes trial participation possible—and what makes it not.