French Legislation Comes in for Strong Criticism
The French government's intention to broadly enlarge the use of off-label drugs for economic reasons is wrong, according to a statement issued by EFPIA
The French government’s intention to broadly enlarge the use of off-label drugs for economic reasons, even if there is an approved drug available, is wrong, according to a statement issued by the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA).
On Tuesday, the French National Assembly voted in support of the draft law proposal, which could allow doctors to use off-label drugs. even if there is an alternative drug approved. This draft law has still to be reviewed by the French Senate, and a review by the French Constitutional Court is also possible.
The draft law specifically references a Roche cancer drug (Avastin) as an alternative eye treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration, an indication for which the drug is not approved and for which two authorized alternatives exist.
“A worrying trend is growing across Europe with governments bypassing important health safeguards and making public health decisions based purely on short-term economic considerations,” noted Richard Bergström, EFPIA Director General. “This move is a material breach of the regulatory framework created to preserve the highest standard of patient safety in Europe.”
The European Commission (EC) must address the issue urgently before it becomes more widespread, and EU member states should not be creating secondary, national marketing authorizations for reasons that undermine the EU regulatory framework and may put patients at risk and deliver only short-term economic gains, he said.
“If public authorities continue to promote off-label use of other, less costly, medicines that have not undergone stringent safety and efficacy assessments, pharmaceutical companies will be discouraged from undergoing the costly and time-consuming authorization process for new indications,” noted Bergström.
EFPIA wants the EC to ensure member states adhere to the European regulatory framework and that financial considerations do not take precedence over the safety of patients.
Read the full release here.
Editor's note: EUCOPE has also commented on the legislation. You can read their response here.
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
