Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
Commentary|Videos|June 2, 2025

How FDA Cuts Are Creating New Bottlenecks in Clinical Operations

In this video interview, Ron Lanton, partner, Lanton Law, talks FDA layoffs and their impact on inspections and clinical trial timelines.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Ron Lanton, partner, Lanton Law, discussed the impact of drug cost increases on clinical research, predicting a reduction in government-sponsored trials due to higher R&D costs and potential funding cuts. Lanton also touched on FDA inspection cuts and how they are expected to slow down the clinical trial supply chain, leading to longer approval times and reduced site readiness.

ACT: How could cuts to spending devoted to FDA inspections impact the clinical trial space?

Lanton: I think, despite assurances that inspectors would not be affected, the FDA layoffs that occurred last April eliminated a lot of support staff who handled a lot of visas and travel arrangements and other logistical operations of the inspections, and in doing so, that effectively made the availability of inspections go down, because inspectors are now responsible for an additional workload, so you can kind of see like a supply demand issue here. Fewer inspections will mean longer wait times for approvals, longer periods between clinical trial stages are going to happen. I think the longer the wait between that stuff, the bigger possibility that a site's private funding will also be cut or put on hold. I think that while demand for site partnerships from pharma sponsors that's at an all-time high of what we've been seeing, I think a reduction in site readiness will significantly slow down the entire clinical trial supply chain, which it's unfortunate.


Related to this article

© putilov_denis - © putilov_denis - stock.adobe.com
Real-time clinical trials require standardized digital data capture at the point of care through scaled eSource-EDC-EHR integration, but progress stalls because competing standards lack regulatory enforcement and one-off system integrations cannot scale beyond single studies without industry-wide alignment and legal clarity on data ownership.
© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.