Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
|Articles|January 15, 2014

Euro Forum for GCP Issues Report on Indemnity Schemes

The European Forum for GCP (EFGCP) has published its final report, ?Indemnity Schemes for Clinical Trials: A Societal Obligation??

The European Forum for GCP (EFGCP) has published its final report, “Indemnity Schemes for Clinical Trials: A Societal Obligation?”.
The document was produced for a workshop held in Brussels, Belgium, last month. It was organized at short notice by the EFGCP, the European Cancer Patient Coalition, the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). More than 40 multi-stakeholder delegates from 16 countries met on 5 December at the headquarters of the EORTC to debate the preferred options for a future European patient indemnity system in clinical trials.
The report makes several key recommendations:
• Put patients first
• There should be equality of indemnity coverage for all European study participants
• “No-fault” schemes are preferable
• Indemnity coverage fees must be reduced
• Coverage conditions must be clearly defined and easy for patients to understand
• A guideline is required to provide better and harmonized definitions of “risk in clinical studies”
• Academia needs the implementation of national indemnification mechanisms on a non-profit basis as, for example, exist in Sweden or Denmark.


Related to this article

What Needs to Happen Beyond the Clinical Trial Modernization Act
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, calls for safe harbor protections, CMS reimbursement safeguards, and funding mechanisms modeled on EHR meaningful use to help community and rural institutions participate in research on par with academic centers.
Building AI Assistants Clinical Trial Teams Can Trust: Q&A with E.K. Koh, Suvoda
In this Q&A, E.K. Koh, chief product officer at Suvoda, discusses what separates a trustworthy AI assistant from one that adds risk, why curated clinical knowledge matters more than general-purpose flexibility, and what safeguards must be in place when assistants move from answering questions to taking actions in clinical trial systems.