Commentary|Videos|August 6, 2024

Delivering Better Outcomes for Patients with LLMs

In the fifth and final part of this video interview, Rama Kondru, PhD, CEO of Veridix AI looks forward to what the LLM landscape in clinical trials could look like in five years.

ACT: Where do you see the use of large language models (LLMs) in clinical trials in five years?

Kondru: The mission of the vision statement at Veridix AI, which I'm the CEO of, is where human intelligence meets artificial intelligence. We have a strong belief that, at least in the clinical space that I'm looking at—AI is going to augment everything that we do every step of the way, not by replacing human beings, but by actually helping them to deliver better outcomes for patients and participants across the globe. I see that there'll be a deep impact on probably seven areas that we are looking at. We talked about trial design and execution, that's one big area that will optimize trial protocols, identify optimal patient populations, and predict trial outcomes. The second area is enhanced patient engagement. We talked about connection with social media. AI-driven chat bots will provide comprehensive patient support, education, and trial participants and trial management with this participation of the patients. Third area, we talked about ethical considerations and bias mitigation, right? Researchers will focus on LLMs to make sure that there are diverse patient populations. Diversity is a must in clinical trials. Fourth area is regulatory compliance. As you know, it's a fairly regulated environment. LLMs hopefully will streamline regulatory submissions, audits, and enable quality in all of the data that we collect. Advanced data analysis instead of finding out there is an issue with the data set—we could actually find it out in near real-time about that particular issue and be able to address it immediately, thereby imparting safety for everything that we do, decreasing the number of safety events is another area which we are looking at, so decreasing adverse events, or serious adverse events, for the patients. Eventually, my hope is truly, anyone across the globe will be able to participate in any clinical trial through this decentralization.

I want to go back to the first statement I began with: clinical acceleration and decentralization are the key aspects of how we can use LLMs to accelerate the entire clinical process, be it for Phase I, Phase II, Phase III, or Phase IV, or investigator-initiated studies, but all parts of this clinical study can be accelerated. We are looking at, as I said, anywhere—text to text, text to table, text to figures, text to listings—transformations happen to ingest some artificial intelligence and LLMs to provide meaningful outcomes for patients.


Related to this article

What the Epilepsy Community Has Taught Us About Trial Feasibility
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, shares what she has learned firsthand from families living with Dravet syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder about what makes trial participation possible—and what makes it not.
Why Seizure Counts Alone Can't Define Success in Epilepsy Trials
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why the full burden of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies extends far beyond clinical symptoms—and why endpoints must reflect what families are actually hoping for.
What It Actually Means to Embed the Patient Voice in Trial Design
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why genuine patient partnership begins before the protocol is written—and what it looks like when patients and caregivers tell you a trial was designed with them in mind.
What This Study Means for Sponsors Still Struggling to Justify RBQM at Scale
In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain how ICH E6(R3) and new empirical evidence of RBQM's net financial impact give sponsors the tools they need to build the multi-functional buy-in required for successful adoption—and why RBQM only delivers full value when it replaces, not supplements, traditional monitoring.