CNS Drugs Take Longer to Develop and Have Lower Success Rates than Other Drugs, According to the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development
Drugs that treat central nervous system diseases take more than a year longer to develop
Drugs that treat central nervous system (CNS) diseases take more than a year longer to develop and are less than half as likely to obtain marketing approval than other drugs, according to a newly completed study by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.
Mean clinical development time for CNS drugs approved for marketing in the United States from 1999 through 2013 was 12.8 months, or 18%, longer than for non-CNS compounds, according to Tufts CSDD.
In addition, the overall clinical approval success rate (share of compounds entering clinical testing that obtain marketing approval) for CNS compounds first tested in human subjects from 1995 to 2007 (and followed through 2013) was 6.2%, or less than half the 13.3% rate for non-CNS drugs.
"CNS drugs are more challenging to develop than other medicines, because the conditions they aim to treat are typically chronic and complex, and clinical endpoints are often difficult to measure," said Joseph A. DiMasi, director of economic analysis at Tufts CSDD and author of the study. "That's why CNS drug development takes longer and has a lower likelihood of overall clinical success than non-CNS drug development."
CNS drugs treat a wide array of psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, including depression, psychosis, epilepsy, and Alzheimer's disease.
The success rate analysis was based on development and approval histories of 274 CNS and 1,168 non-CNS investigational compounds, and the approval phase time analysis was based on 42 CNS and 345 non-CNS therapeutic compounds approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Other findings from the study, reported in the November/December Tufts CSDD Impact Report, released today, include the following:
- During 1999-13, mean approval phase time for CNS compounds approved for marketing in the U.S. was 19.3 months, or 31% longer than the 14.7 months for non-CNS approvals.
- From 1999 to 2013, about one in six CNS compounds received a priority review rating from the FDA, compared to nearly half of all non-CNS compounds.
- Despite longer clinical and approval phase times, and lower clinical success rates, CNS approvals have held steady, accounting for about one in 10 of all U.S. approvals since the 1980s.
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
