Women Prefer HIV Trials They Discover Through Peers
Women are often underrepresented in HIV clinical trials, but they appear to prefer finding out about trials by means of peer-to-peer communication, according to new analysis.
Women are often underrepresented in HIV clinical trials, making it difficult to decipher the relevance of findings and whether they are applicable to all, but they appear to prefer finding out about trials by means of peer-to-peer communication, according to new analysis.
Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS) researchers Sara Looby, PhD, and Markella Zanni, MD, uncovered women’s preferred methods for learning about a clinical study were peer-to-peer communication (52% of those questioned), provider communication (46%), and video-based communication (39%). Women were most likely to take part to gain information (63%) and to help others (47%).
Coinciding with National Women and Girls HIV/AIDS Awareness Day in the U.S., which was March 10, they have published their data in the Taylor & Francis journal HIV Clinical Trials. The article shows how an evidence-based campaign, Follow YOUR Heart, is empowering older women with HIV to participate in a large-scale clinical trial, called REPRIEVE, which is aimed at preventing cardiovascular disease.
“Feedback from our community sample of women offered valuable perspectives on methods to help educate and engage women with HIV on research participation, making our Follow YOUR Heart campaign truly patient-centered,” the authors noted.
Looby is assistant professor of Medicine at HMS, a principal investigator in the Program of Nutritional Metabolism, and a nurse scientist at the Yvonne L. Munn Center for Nursing Research at MGH. Her research is focused on cardiometabolic and bone health among individuals aging with HIV, particularly women. She also has conducted studies related to menopause symptoms, and cardiovascular disease in relation to reproductive aging.
Zanni is a physician in the MGH Neuroendocrine Clinical Center, a faculty member in the Neuroendocrine Unit at MGH, and an assistant professor of medicine at HMS. She is a clinical researcher in the MGH Program in Nutritional Metabolism and she studies metabolic and cardiovascular complications of inflammation.
Philip Ward is the European Editor for Applied Clinical Trials
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
Reaching Diverse Patient Populations With Personalized Treatment Methods
January 20th 2025Daejin Abidoye, head of solid tumors, oncology development, AbbVie, discusses a number of topics around diversity in clinical research including industry’s greatest challenges in reaching diverse patient populations, personalized treatment methods, recruitment strategies, and more.
