A new report from Escher, the independent TI Pharma platform for regulatory innovation, shows that the current regulatory system for medicines in Europe can be used in a more efficient and effective manner.
A new report from Escher, the independent TI Pharma platform for regulatory innovation, shows that the current regulatory system for medicines in Europe can be used in a more efficient and effective manner. André Broekmans, chairman of Escher: “ Overall, the EU regulatory system operates well, however important recent changes had not yet been evaluated. One of our conclusions is that pathways that were intended to bring important new medicines faster to the market are not used in the right way. We are therefore missing opportunities to make medicines available to patients earlier.”
Escher collaborated with researchers from Utrecht University to look into a number of areas that might be improved: pharmacovigilance, conditional approval, paediatric investigation plans and decentralized authorisation procedures. The research shows that some parts of the regulations are not yet fully achieving the effects they were intended to have. For example, the conditional marketing authorisation pathway was intended to bring much-needed products, for example for cancer treatment, to the market faster. The researchers found, however, that in practice it has often been used as a back-up for the ‘normal’ approval pathway, because requesting conditional approval had some perceived drawbacks (e.g. potential reimbursement issues and the level of post-marketing obligations). The researchers also identified opportunities for making the regulatory system more efficient, without compromising public health, for example by adjusting the timing of the submission and the level of detail of plans for the investigation of medicines in children.”
Broekmans states that these discrepancies between the initial objectives of legislation and the effects of regulatory instruments in real-world practice should be better monitored: “The way in which formal assessments of regulatory instruments are conducted needs to be strengthened. Also, one of the main messages from the report is that the effectiveness of regulatory instruments can be increased by reflecting on the interpretation and implementation of the primary legislation. Companies and authorities need to learn together how to better use the opportunities that the current system provides. This is especially important as we are heading towards a future with more adaptive approaches to regulation and medicines with different profiles and characteristics.”
Richard Bergström, Director General of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), notes: “Our latest learning from genomics and our improved understanding of human biology have resulted in a record number of promising break-through medicines in development. Entering a new era of personalised medicine, the current model for medicines development and approval may not be appropriate. Against this background EFPIA decided to provide an unrestricted research grant to the Escher platform to explore if the model is fit for purpose."
Hubertus Cranz, Director General of the Association of the European Self-Medication Industry (AESGP) who also funded the research, says that another important conclusion of the report is that “the research from Escher shows that many areas can be improved without having to adapt the legislation itself, but by working on a better implementation.”
Escher chairman André Broekmans: “There was a real value in working together with multiple stakeholders through the Escher platform: we were able to carry out the research independently but still work closely with companies, regulatory authorities and other societal stakeholders. Their contributions with data, expertise and experience enabled us to gain valuable insights into the development and authorisation process for new medicines.”
Visit the Escher website for more information: escher.tipharma.com. The report describing the research can be downloaded from 18 September 9:00 AM, CET.
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.