As sponsors push for faster, more representative studies, AI-enabled matching and EHR integration are emerging as operational levers, but bias, explainability, and governance will determine whether the technology scales.
Feature|Articles|June 29, 2026
Real-Time Clinical Trials: What the FDA's Push Toward Continuous Oversight Means for Sponsors
Author(s)Andy Studna, Senior Editor
The FDA's launch of real-time clinical trial proof-of-concept studies signals a fundamental shift in regulatory oversight, one that most sponsors are not yet equipped to meet and that demands urgent investment in unified data infrastructure, quality-by-design practices, and protocol digitization.
Advertisement
Advertisement
The FDA's launch of proof-of-concept real-time clinical trials marks one of the most consequential shifts in regulatory oversight in decades. By enabling near real-time visibility into safety signals and endpoint data as trials progress, the agency is pushing the industry toward a continuous development model that most sponsors are not yet operationally equipped to support.
Related to this article
Why clinical development’s next AI bottleneck is not the model, but the system around it.
Clinical trials have spent decades perfecting data capture, but the execution layer underneath it, including decision workflows, data collection design, and lab connectivity, remains fragmented in ways that limit what AI can realistically deliver and that quietly compromise the scientific validity of the data itself.
In this Q&A, John Worden, chief commercial officer at Javara, discusses why clinical trial recruitment has remained stubbornly one-size-fits-all, how AI can identify patients at scale without displacing the clinician relationships that drive trust, and what care-integrated research engagement needs to look like for health systems, sponsors, and sites.
Participant engagement depends more on clarity and understanding than on gamification or incentives, requiring engagement embedded into trial workflows as a core design component rather than a peripheral consideration
In this Q&A, Patrick Mizer, chief technology officer at Ledger Run, discusses how payment reliability has become a competitive differentiator in site selection, why decades of disconnected workflows have made payment inconsistency a structural problem, and where AI is delivering real value in the high-friction parts of clinical trial payments.
In a video interview prior to the 2026 DPHARM conference, Andrea Valente, CEO of uMotif, shares what she expects to be at the center of the conversation—from building trust between patients and sites to where AI may and may not have a role in that relationship.
A platform-based approach connects AI across workflows, data and governance, helping life sciences organizations move from isolated wins to real scale.
Advertisement
Advertisement