Physicians are increasingly advocating a patient-centered approach to practicing medicine, and both regulatory agencies and manufacturers also seem to agree that patient reported outcomes (PROs) are valuable.
Physicians are increasingly advocating a patient-centered approach to practicing medicine, and both regulatory agencies and manufacturers also seem to agree that patient reported outcomes (PROs) are valuable. Considering this increasing industry-wide interest, you would expect that PROs are increasingly being used across various aspects of drug development - in clinical trials, regulatory reviews, and reimbursement assessments.
At the 17th Annual International Meeting of the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) we presented the results of research examining the use of PROs in HTAs. That study examined 324 reviews published by nine agencies from 2005-2011 for 13 disease conditions.
We thought it would be interesting to revisit this question as our application now has many more reviews available for analysis than in 2012. For the updated analysis, we examined 1,567 reviews. This allowed us to compare the behavior of 12 regulatory agencies worldwide from 2005 to 2012 across 44 disease conditions. Of these reviews 1,394 allowed us to determine definitively whether or not they used PROs. In our update, we restricted consideration to this set of reviews.
Our results were generally consistent with our earlier findings.
Clearly it’s taking some time for the industry to catch up to what it says it wants to do. It will be interesting to revisit this story again next year to see if 2013 begins to show an upward trend in the use of PROs.