Legislation fails to establish a national track-and-trace system, but tackles shortages, orphans.
House and Senate leaders announced final agreement June 18, 2012 on legislation that authorizes industry user fees to support Food and Drug Administration regulatory programs. The bipartisan measure moved through Congress quickly with an eye to avoid getting tangled up in fallout from the imminent Supreme Court decision on health reform, as well as election-year politicking. The FDA Safety and Innovation Act (S. 3187) reauthorizes the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), renews user fees for medical devices and establishes new fees for oversight of generic drugs and for future biosimilar therapies.
FDASIA reflects agreement on the need to spur development of new antibiotics and treatments for rare conditions. It includes a number of provisions sought by FDA to better secure the pharma supply chain, to block import of adulterated products and to detect and prevent drug shortages. However, the legislators failed to agree on a national track-and-trace system for ensuring the integrity of drugs moving through the distribution system. Continued disagreement among wholesalers, manufacturers and pharmacies now opens the way for the states to craft diverse drug pedigree requirements, and to FDA to propose national standards where appropriate.
Several other contentious issues were dropped from the final bill. Generic drug makers lost out on an effort to prevent brand manufacturers from using Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) to block access to innovator products needed to test and develop generic versions of drugs and biologics. And pharmacists scuttled a move to stiffen controls on hydrocodone-combination painkillers, proposed as a way to curb rampant abuse of prescription drugs.
The legislation will keep FDA busy with a host of requirements for new guidances, new rules and multiple reports. But more than $6 billion in user fees will roll in over the next five years to keep the agency going.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
Reaching Diverse Patient Populations With Personalized Treatment Methods
January 20th 2025Daejin Abidoye, head of solid tumors, oncology development, AbbVie, discusses a number of topics around diversity in clinical research including industry’s greatest challenges in reaching diverse patient populations, personalized treatment methods, recruitment strategies, and more.
Phase III Trial Data Show Subcutaneous Pembrolizumab as Noninferior to IV Keytruda
March 31st 2025Subcutaneous administration of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy demonstrated a nearly 50% reduction in patient chair and treatment room time while maintaining efficacy and safety endpoints compared to intravenous Keytruda.
Phase II ALPACA Trial Shows Lepodisiran Produces Significant, Sustained Lipoprotein(a) Reductions
March 31st 2025Eli Lilly’s lepodisiran, an investigational siRNA therapy, achieved significant and durable reductions in lipoprotein(a) levels, a major genetic risk factor for cardiovascular disease.