Results from the Phase III CARTITUDE-4 trial show Carvykti (ciltacabtagene autoleucel) is the first and only cell therapy to show an overall survival benefit compared to standard therapies for patients with relapsed or lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma.
Credit: abdelaziz@771 | stock.adobe.com
Carvykti (ciltacabtagene autoleucel) was found to produce a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed or lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma, according to long-term data from the Phase III CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) trial.1,2
The BCMA-directed, genetically modified autologous T-cell immunotherapy was found to lower the risk of death by 45% compared to standard treatments consisting of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) or daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (DPd). In achieving this result, Carvykti becomes the first and only cell therapy to show an OS benefit compared with standard treatments as early as the second line in treating lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma.
“The three-year follow-up data from the Phase III CARTITUDE-4 study show a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival and quality-of-life measures with Carvykti versus standard therapies—meaningful results that have the potential to transform the multiple myeloma treatment landscape,” study investigator Binod Dhakal, MD, MS, associate professor of Medicine at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Division of Hematology, said in a press release. “This adds to the growing body of data reinforcing the promise of a single infusion of Carvykti, which, in addition to demonstrating a significant [OS] benefit, also offers patients the opportunity of a period free from multiple myeloma treatment as early as second line.”1
In March 2024, the FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) recommended Carvykti in earlier lines of treatment for adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received at least one line of therapy—including a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent—and who are refractory to lenalidomide. ODAC voted 11-0 in favor of Carvykti based on data from CARTITUDE-4, which showed an encouraging risk-benefit profile.3
The global, randomized, controlled CARTITUDE-4 compared Carvykti with PVd or DPd in lenalidomide refractory patients. Investigators randomly assigned 208 patients to receive Carvykti and 211 patients to receive the standard therapies.4
Data at the 30-month follow-up showed a 76% OS rate in the Carvykti cohort compared to 64% in the standard therapies cohort. At a median follow-up of 34 months, median OS in both the Carvykti cohort and the standard therapies cohort was not reached (95% Confidence Interval [CI], not estimable [NE] – NE) and (95% CI, 37.75 months – NE) (Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.79; P=0.0009).
Patients in the Carvykti cohort experienced a 45% reduction in the risk of death compared to the standard therapies cohort. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the Carvykti cohort (95% CI, 34.50 months – NE) compared with 11.79 months (95% CI, 9.66-14.00) in the standard therapies cohort.
Further, the Carvykti cohort showed a 77% complete response or better, with an 85% overall response rate, as well as 62% minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10^-5) and 57% MRD-negativity (10^-6) vs. patients in the standard therapies cohort (18.5%, 9% respectively). Median duration of response was not reached (95% CI, NE-NE) in the Carvykti cohort compared to 18.7 months (95% CI, 12.9-23.7) in the standard therapies cohort.
In terms of safety, the profile of Carvykti compared with standard therapies was consistent with findings from prior trials. Across both cohorts, 97% of patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, the most frequently reported of which was cytopenia. Treatment-emergent infections were reported by 64% of patients in the Carvykti cohort compared with 76% of patients in the standard therapies cohort.
“Carvykti is the first and only cell therapy approved for the treatment of patients with myeloma as early as second line, and now also the first and only cell therapy to improve overall survival and demonstrate improved patient quality-of-life outcomes versus standard therapies for patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma,” Jordan Schecter, MD, VP, Disease Area Leader, Multiple Myeloma, Innovative Medicine, Johnson & Johnson, said in a press release.1
References
1. CARVYKTI® is the first and only cell therapy to significantly extend overall survival versus standard therapies for patients with multiple myeloma as early as second line. News release. Johnson & Johnson. September 27, 2024. Accessed September 30, 2024. https://www.jnj.com/media-center/press-releases/carvykti-is-the-first-and-only-cell-therapy-to-significantly-extend-overall-survival-versus-standard-therapies-for-patients-with-multiple-myeloma-as-early-as-second-line
2. A Study Comparing JNJ-68284528, a CAR-T Therapy Directed Against B-cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA), Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) or Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (DPd) in Participants With Relapsed and Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (CARTITUDE-4). ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated September 19, 2024. Accessed September 30, 2024. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04181827?intr=Cilta-cel&rank=3
3. U.S. FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee recommends CARVYKTI® (ciltacabtagene autoleucel) for the earlier treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Johnson & Johnson. March 15, 2024. Accessed September 30, 2024. https://www.jnj.com/media-center/press-releases/u-s-fda-oncologic-drugs-advisory-committee-recommends-carvykti-ciltacabtagene-autoleucel-for-the-earlier-treatment-of-patients-with-relapsed-or-refractory-multiple-myeloma
4. Binod Dhakal et al,. First phase 3 results from CARTITUDE-4: Cilta-cel versus standard of care (PVd or DPd) in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. JCO 41, LBA106-LBA106(2023). DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.17_suppl.LBA106.
Investigational Pain Therapy Cebranopadol Succeeds in Second Phase III Clinical Trial
March 6th 2025Tris Pharma’s first-in-class oral dual-NMR agonist achieved its primary endpoint in the ALLEVIATE-2 study by demonstrating a statistically significant and high level of pain reduction compared to placebo.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
Reaching Diverse Patient Populations With Personalized Treatment Methods
January 20th 2025Daejin Abidoye, head of solid tumors, oncology development, AbbVie, discusses a number of topics around diversity in clinical research including industry’s greatest challenges in reaching diverse patient populations, personalized treatment methods, recruitment strategies, and more.
Xolair Outperforms Oral Immunotherapy in Landmark Phase III OUtMATCH Food Allergy Trial
March 3rd 2025Xolair (omalizumab) shows superior efficacy and safety compared to multi-allergen oral immunotherapy in treating food allergies in the Phase III OUtMATCH trial, suggesting the potential to facilitate the introduction of allergenic foods into patients' diets after treatment.