More recent ClinicalTrials.gov data indicate that the United States remains the central location for clinical trial activity.
For a number of years there has been discussion about the relative levels of clinical trial activity in the United States and Western Europe, on the one hand, and in the emerging countries, on the other. This seems to be one of the more popular topics at drug development professional conferences. A previous column (Applied Clinical Trials Dec 5, 2016) with ClinicalTrials.gov data indicated that the absolute and relative amount of commercially sponsored clinical activity in North America and Europe remained unchanged between 2008 and 2013. More recent ClinicalTrials.gov data indicate that the United States remains the central location for clinical trial activity.
Clinical trials are conducted to gather patient data, the most critical element in the new drug approval process. But the placement of clinical trials is a function of a number of elements, not the least of which is a country’s market attractiveness. Through clinical trials a sponsor company learns more about how the new drug might be used by medical professionals in a particular country. Clinical trials gather information, but they also signal information to a market about a sponsor company’s longer term new drug launch priorities. On a cost per patient basis some of the newer geographies are frequently lower than more established areas like the United States and Europe. However, many companies have found that the costs of conducting clinical trials in these newer geographies to be sometimes higher than originally anticipated when all the site operational costs are taken into account. The United States despite the higher costs of investigator payments remains the most attractive market for new drugs.
Over time it has become clear that there is a reporting lag of about six months to a year in ClinicalTrials.gov, a lag which increases to about a year for ex-US data. Over time as additional data appear the 2015 and 2016 will most likely resemble the 2014 figures. Nonetheless, the current ClinicalTrials.gov data show no trend away from the United States as a place to locate clinical trial sites. Discussions about conducting clinical trials in new geographies should remain an important topic at professional meetings, particularly for the more exotic locations.
Site Location
Total Sites in Industry Sponsored Phase 3 Studies
Percentage of Sites in the United States
2014
48,760
38%
2015
45,318
40%
2016
32,581
46%
Driving Diversity with the Integrated Research Model
October 16th 2024Ashley Moultrie, CCRP, senior director, DEI & community engagement, Javara discusses current trends and challenges with achieving greater diversity in clinical trials, how integrated research organizations are bringing care directly to patients, and more.
Empowering Sites and Patients: The Impact of Personalized Support in Clinical Trials
November 26th 2024To meet the growing demands of clinical research, sponsors must prioritize comprehensive support models, such as clinical site ambassadors and patient journey coordinators, who can address operational challenges and improve site relationships, patient satisfaction, and overall trial efficiency.
AI in Clinical Trials: A Long, But Promising Road Ahead
May 29th 2024Stephen Pyke, chief clinical data and digital officer, Parexel, discusses how AI can be used in clinical trials to streamline operational processes, the importance of collaboration and data sharing in advancing the use of technology, and more.
FDA Finalizes Decentralized Clinical Trial Guidance
November 25th 2024The FDA's guidance is part of a broader effort to modernize clinical trials, improve efficiency, reduce participant burden, and expand access, particularly for underrepresented populations and those in geographically or economically constrained areas.